I find it strange you use a bunch of value metrics for investing, but also use technical analysis, when they are logical opposites. Its like being an atheist who still prays to god before making a decision.
I see it more like steak and lobster, both are great on their own, but together, they really shine!
To be more serious, I am a fundamental investor at heart, but I believe a touch of technical analysis can help pinpoint attractive buying opportunities (and to be honest, I don't spend hours to read charts and try to be extremely precise. I am not a trader)
Un retour de 27,3 % en moins d’un an ? Soit tu as une boule de cristal, soit tu as trouvé la formule magique du trading… et vu la structure de ton raisonnement, j’opterais plutôt pour la deuxième option.
J’aime beaucoup ton approche de la sélection rigoureuse et du TSR à 20 % (ça change des influenceurs qui vendent du rêve avec des actions moonshots). Mais une question me taraude : avec un PEG sous 1 comme critère clé, as-tu identifié des secteurs où ce ratio est plus fréquent ou est-ce un critère qui te pousse à fouiller dans des endroits inattendus ?
PS : La discipline sur les zones d'achat, c'est beau à lire, mais avoue… tu n’as jamais eu la tentation d’acheter un petit dip juste pour voir ? 😆 /****/ A 27.3% return in less than a year? Either you have a crystal ball, or you've cracked the magic formula for trading… and judging by your reasoning, I'd bet on the latter.
I really like your rigorous stock selection approach and the 20% TSR target (it’s refreshing compared to influencers selling dreams with moonshot stocks). But one question keeps bugging me: with a PEG below 1 as a key criterion, have you found certain sectors where this ratio is more common, or does it push you to dig into unexpected places?
PS: Sticking to buy zones is great in theory, but be honest… you’ve never been tempted to buy a little dip just to see what happens? 😆
- Regarding the PEG under 1, it is certainly easier to find in some sectors. For example, I am comfortable accepting a higher PEG of 1 in the software sector, as it can sometimes be too limiting. However, a PEG below 1 helps narrow down potential candidates. Naturally, you will see this ratio more frequently in sectors with lower valuations, such as energy and commodities
- And yes, there are times when I have bought the dip when I probably shouldn’t have. To minimize that risk, I make all my investment decisions over the weekend when the markets are closed, allowing me to filter out market noise and avoid impulsive choices
Thank you !
My pleasure!
I find it strange you use a bunch of value metrics for investing, but also use technical analysis, when they are logical opposites. Its like being an atheist who still prays to god before making a decision.
I see it more like steak and lobster, both are great on their own, but together, they really shine!
To be more serious, I am a fundamental investor at heart, but I believe a touch of technical analysis can help pinpoint attractive buying opportunities (and to be honest, I don't spend hours to read charts and try to be extremely precise. I am not a trader)
Un retour de 27,3 % en moins d’un an ? Soit tu as une boule de cristal, soit tu as trouvé la formule magique du trading… et vu la structure de ton raisonnement, j’opterais plutôt pour la deuxième option.
J’aime beaucoup ton approche de la sélection rigoureuse et du TSR à 20 % (ça change des influenceurs qui vendent du rêve avec des actions moonshots). Mais une question me taraude : avec un PEG sous 1 comme critère clé, as-tu identifié des secteurs où ce ratio est plus fréquent ou est-ce un critère qui te pousse à fouiller dans des endroits inattendus ?
PS : La discipline sur les zones d'achat, c'est beau à lire, mais avoue… tu n’as jamais eu la tentation d’acheter un petit dip juste pour voir ? 😆 /****/ A 27.3% return in less than a year? Either you have a crystal ball, or you've cracked the magic formula for trading… and judging by your reasoning, I'd bet on the latter.
I really like your rigorous stock selection approach and the 20% TSR target (it’s refreshing compared to influencers selling dreams with moonshot stocks). But one question keeps bugging me: with a PEG below 1 as a key criterion, have you found certain sectors where this ratio is more common, or does it push you to dig into unexpected places?
PS: Sticking to buy zones is great in theory, but be honest… you’ve never been tempted to buy a little dip just to see what happens? 😆
Thank you for your message – great questions!
- Regarding the PEG under 1, it is certainly easier to find in some sectors. For example, I am comfortable accepting a higher PEG of 1 in the software sector, as it can sometimes be too limiting. However, a PEG below 1 helps narrow down potential candidates. Naturally, you will see this ratio more frequently in sectors with lower valuations, such as energy and commodities
- And yes, there are times when I have bought the dip when I probably shouldn’t have. To minimize that risk, I make all my investment decisions over the weekend when the markets are closed, allowing me to filter out market noise and avoid impulsive choices